Huge or minimal performance hit running game servers on a Virtual Machine? [closed]

Posted by Damainman on Server Fault See other posts from Server Fault or by Damainman
Published on 2012-10-13T00:31:30Z Indexed on 2012/10/13 3:39 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 463

Filed under:
|
|

I have a two dedicated servers to choose from depending on which one would do a better job. I plan on updating the Hard Drive space and RAM at a later date depending on how I move forward.

Server 1:

  • 500GB Hard Drive
  • 8GB RAM
  • 2x 64bit Intel Xeon L5420(Quad Core) @ 2.50Ghz

Server2:

  • 500GB Hard Drive
  • 8GB RAM
  • 2x 64bit Intel Xeon E5420(Quad Core) @ 2.50GHz

I want to run a virtual machine that will host about 10 game servers, with about 16 active slots per server. It will be a mix and match from:

  • Minecraft
  • Counter Strike( 1.6, Source, Global Offensive)
  • Battlefield
  • Team Fortress

I know the general consensus is virtualization is a horrible idea if you plan on running virtual servers on them. The issue is, the discussions I read do not really clearly state whether they are speaking about a virtual server running inside an OS(ie: VMware Player running on Windows with the game server in a VM) or a Hypervisor such as Xen Cloud Platform.

I am trying to get a definite answer on how feasible the above would be and how much of a performance hit it might be if the VM running the game servers is on a hypervisor such as Xen Cloud Platform. My initial research lead me to believe that there wouldn't be a performance hit since the virtualization is different than running it via inside of a OS.

© Server Fault or respective owner

Related posts about virtualization

Related posts about gameserver